Compulsory Purchase Orders on the Table as Anfield Redevelopment Moves Forward

More delays could be on their way
Any news coming out of the Anfield redevelopment front has been painful at best and today we crawled a little closer – through broken glass and cigarette butts of course – towards the ultimate goal of expanding the historic stadium to accommodate 60,000 people as well as revitalize the surrounding area with news that compulsory purchase orders could be issued if a swift resolution isn’t found.

The problem with compulsory purchase order is that – according to the Chris Bascombe in the Telegraph – is that the club could face a lengthy legal fight that could delay the submission of the new stadium plans by up to two years. There are six key houses that need to be purchased in order to move forward with the expansion; four of them are derelict and the remaining two are unoccupied by their owners. While these CPO’s have always been seen as a last resort, it’s come time for them to be seriously considered and Liverpool City Council will debate later this month, and decide early next year, whether to push them through.

Last weekend it was bats that were standing in the way of Liverpool moving forward with the expansion, but now we’re back to plain, old stubborn people. Those who reside in the Anfield area have overwhelmingly backed the project and the Liverpool mayor Joe Anderson has echoed that. “We have had overwhelming support from local residents and businesses for our plans and there is unarguable public interest in driving these proposals forward” said the mayor.

Steve Graves, writing in the Liverpool Echo, says that out of the 699 properties originally earmarked for demolition, 279 are either in the process of or are waiting to be demolished, 346 have already been purchased or have pending sales and the remainder are in talks to sell.

It’s been over 10 years since stadium proposals and regeneration of the Anfield area has been put on the table with numerous proposals – as well as a switch for the club to a brand new facility in Stanley Park – falling by the wayside, but Anderson seems determined to see this one through to the end. “The people of Anfield have been let down too often in the past. We will not let them down again.” The club, and their owners Fenway Sports Group, have showed the same kind of steely determination.

As soon as the club confirmed last year that expanding the stadium, rather than building a new one, was the preferred option, work began on driving the project forward. Despite the slow movement, word coming out of the Reds hierarchy remains positive and last month Ian Ayre confirmed that we were making steady progress. “Our ambition is to stay at Anfield, and we’re about 90% down the road in securing proprieties affected by redevelopment. I’m reasonably confident, the first phase will be closer to 60,000 capacity” said the Liverpool managing director.

The £260mil regeneration project is long overdue for both the club and the area. The Reds needing to compete on the financial field in order to compete on the football field has been a well worn turn of phrase for some time now and it’s one that everyone, including myself, is tired of using; especially when we’ve had this carrot dangled in front of us so many times in the past. Football aside, the revitalization of an area that has long been in decline is something massive for the city of Liverpool and the proposed shopping facilities, hotel, public space – as well as new homes – represents a push into the future; one that will benefit both the club and the city itself.


Steven McMillan

Can’t find up from down or tell black from white, but doesn't care cause it’s all Red to him. When he's not pissing and moaning about all things Liverpool, he’s chatting nonsense with his multiple personalities — or his “entourage” as he likes to call them.

3 thoughts on “Compulsory Purchase Orders on the Table as Anfield Redevelopment Moves Forward

  • October 17, 2013 at 5:58 pm

    This scenario has ever been on the table since negotiations commenced years ago.There has always been an inevitability that some property owners would hold out and hold out until as owners dwindled it was favourable to ransom their own terms. Any legal battle will consume at least the next 3 to 4 years at considerable cost. We will be no further on that we are at this moment. This was mentioned many years ago as being one major concern and why a completely new stadium was preferable. The idea of what has now occurred was poo-pooed at that time.

  • October 17, 2013 at 6:57 pm

    From what I understand, this was something that was always seen as a possible outcome, but the club hoped and worked to avoid. The fact that it’s now on the table, and going to be put towards Liverpool City Council at the end of the month is news to me.

    I’m sure the buzz around the area, the club and the city is far more accurate, and possibly closer to the truth, to what we get to read in the media.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *